Intelligent, not second best. Internet

Mar 10 - 2023

Intelligent, not second best. Internet

The intelligent industry has emerged as the next vastness of e-commerce players. You can see a hint of it if you look at the new layout of Ali, Jindo, and Jingdong alone. Ali has divided its organizational structure into two sections: "Chinese digital business" and "foreign digital business"; Jindo is strengthening its own digital empowerment and agricultural construction; and Jingdong is continuing to digitally calculate best antminer the logistics system it has built in the past. Digitalization is becoming a new consensus among more and more players as a breakthrough to open the next development process of the e-commerce industry.

Indeed, when compared to the Internet, intelligence can bring us enough imagination, and in the general environment of digital reality integration, Internet players who have accumulated abundant digital energy in the Internet era, once again into the wave of digital, as well as not inconsistent. Plus, intelligence has the potential to change not only the traditional retail industry, but also some Internet players. As a result, intelligence has become the link between the previous network era and the future digital era.

Through digital methods and approaches to transform the Internet industry represented by e-commerce and offline stores as the representative of the real industry, new development can be brought about, breaking the network era's binary shape of online and offline. Completing the true sense of intelligence, on the other hand, is far more difficult and time-consuming than completing the Internet. If you use the Internet for bitmain shop intelligence practice, you will undoubtedly bring intelligence into the Internet's predicament.

Intelligent first, Internet second.

Many people in the digitalization treatment simply regard intelligence as the exclusive use of Internet players. One crucial reason is that, in their eyes, the digital players are the leaders and winners of the Internet era. So are Ali, Jingdong, and Jindo. If only the identity of the participants is used to judge intelligence by Internet players, it is obvious that the development of digitalization will be brought into the Internet's quandary. To truly grasp the essence and connotation of digitalization, one must first understand the internal logic of digitalization, then find the way and method to implement and practice digitalization, and finally see intelligence as a universal emergence.

Intelligence, in my opinion, is an emergence in which any type of player can participate. They can join the wave of digitalization with their own unique advantages and conditions, whether they are Internet players or traditional players. Indeed, as previously stated, Internet players, particularly large Internet players, have amassed a large amount of traffic in the Internet era, and these flows constitute data assets after deposition, giving them a natural advantage in joining the digital wave.

These data assets can be combined with new technologies, allowing them to take advantage of the first-mover advantage of digitalization and even use the Internet's speed to achieve intelligence. However, intelligence must achieve close integration with the real economy, particularly to complete a deep transformation for the real economy to be truly complete. Yes, Internet players have an inherent advantage in data, but these data assets must be landed and used in the real world to reflect their full function and role.

The function and role of traditional entity enterprises began to emerge around this time. Although traditional entities lack the benefits of data or even new technology research and development, they do have a comprehensive set of production processes and a relatively complete production chain. Even if Internet players have the leading digital technology, if these digital technologies are not applied to real-world enterprises, they will not be able to play their full function and role.

As a result, traditional physical enterprises' roles are gradually diminishing. In some ways, traditional physical enterprises serve as a testing ground and application field for digital technology. Those digital technologies developed by Internet players have a scenario of application with traditional entity enterprises. Without this, Internet player-led intelligence is nothing more than a floating word game on the surface.

As a result, we should take a fresh look at intelligence, rather than being blinded by the identities of intelligent players. On the one hand, Internet players have leading digital technology, which they can use to transform traditional industries; on the other hand, traditional industries continue to provide Internet players with intelligent landing and application soil, and they can continue to practice the results obtained in the application process feedback to the Internet players, allowing them to better calibrate digital technology to achieve continuous evolution and transformation.

Intelligence is not limited to Internetantminer price players, but is a new category in which both digital and physical players participate. After intelligence is obtained, the Internet player and the physical player that we typically see in the network era will be calibrated in the manner in which they are separated from each other, and the economic forms that have been formed will be integrated together. There is no such thing as "harvesting" or "breeding" in the true sense of the digital era, but rather a process in which different economic forms can play their own functions and roles.

By:Hellen